Why Can’t We Talk About Sin Anymore?

Written By Graeme Flett

Mention the word "sin" in casual conversation and watch what happens. Someone laughs. Someone looks away. Someone changes the subject. It's one of Christianity's most central ideas, and yet it has become one of the hardest to actually talk about.

That tension is the starting point for Rev Dr. Joshua Taylor's PhD research, Speaking of Sin in 21st Century Aotearoa. Taylor set out to understand why the language of sin has largely vanished from public conversation — and why, when it does come up, it's so often misunderstood, trivialised, or weaponised. As he puts it, the word has picked up so much baggage that for many people it now carries almost entirely negative connotations.

But Taylor's conclusion isn't that the church should quietly drop the concept and move on. Instead, he argues that sin remains essential to Christian theology — it offers real insight into human brokenness, responsibility, and our need for restoration. The challenge isn't whether to talk about sin, but how.

Five Things Taylor Learned Along the Way

1. Sin doesn't make sense on its own.

You can't talk about sin in isolation. It only makes sense within the bigger story — creation, salvation, redemption. Strip it out of that context, and it becomes either an abstract accusation or a source of shame, rather than what it's meant to be: part of the account of how God, in Christ, is putting a broken world right.

2. Don't assume everyone means the same thing by "sin."

Walk into a room today and ask people what sin means, and you'll get wildly different answers — some shaped by pop culture, some by bad church experiences, some by nothing at all. Taylor's research suggests we can't assume a shared starting point anymore. That means slowing down to explain the term carefully and setting it firmly within its theological home, rather than assuming it will land the way it once did.

3. Sin is relational, not just moral.

Perhaps the most significant shift Taylor points to is this: sin isn't primarily a moral scorecard of rules broken. It's about a broken relationship — our alienation from God, from each other, from ourselves, and from creation itself. Framed this way, sin-talk stops being about tallying up failures and starts pointing somewhere hopeful: toward God's reconciling work through Christ.

4. Sin-talk needs compassion.

If sin is about brokenness rather than a checklist of wrongs, then the way we speak about it matters enormously. Taylor is clear that the purpose of naming sin isn't condemnation — it's pointing people toward healing and redemption. That means being especially careful with those who have been wounded by other people's sin, and making sure love, not judgment, is what drives the conversation.

5. Sin-talk needs humility.

There's no room here for speaking from above. Christians who talk about sin do so as fellow sinners, not from some higher vantage point. For Taylor, humility isn't optional — every honest conversation about sin has to begin with an acknowledgment of one's own need for grace.

The Bottom Line

Pulling these threads together, Taylor's overall conclusion is that good, effective Christian sin-talk is theologically grounded, carefully explained, relationally framed, compassionate in tone, and humble in posture — always pointing people toward God's reconciling grace in Jesus Christ, never toward condemnation.

Far from being a relic of an earlier, more judgmental era, Taylor's work suggests the doctrine of sin still has real work to do — for how the church understands the human condition, and for how it speaks into contemporary Aotearoa New Zealand.

Want to Go Deeper?

If this has sparked your thinking, here are a few places to explore further:

For discussion: When you hear the word sin, what reactions does it provoke in your context — and why is it often so hard to talk about? What do you think is lost when the language of sin is avoided altogether?

Graeme Flett
Next

The Limits of Self-Leadership: Why the best leaders don’t go it alone